Client Feedback
What clients say about our cyber assurance work.
Most DDG work touches sensitive areas: risk, controls, incidents, and board-level decisions. That means public logos and detailed case studies are deliberately limited.
Selected feedback
Recent Cyber Posture Review and assurance feedback.
Selected comments are anonymised where needed because the work often involves confidential risk, internal controls, and board-level decisions.
“We finally have one clear picture of where we are exposed, what matters most, and which projects we actually need to fund. The board understood it on the first read.”
Chief Operating Officer
UK professional services firm
“This was the first time someone translated all our tools and policies into a single story we could use with insurers, clients and the board. We are using the Fix-First Plan as our roadmap now.”
Finance Director
500-person UK organisation
“Our IT team had been saying some of this for years, but having an independent view with business impact attached meant we finally got the budget to fix the right things.”
Head of IT
UK national organisation
Why no logo wall
Cyber assurance is different to selling SaaS.
Clients often value discretion as much as clarity. Instead of forcing public logos, DDG keeps the proof focused on outcomes, references, and repeat work.
Many clients do not want their name on a security page, even when the work is good.
A lot of what DDG does involves internal weaknesses, incidents, and supplier issues.
Some work sits behind NDAs, board packs, due diligence, and insurance processes.
What we focus on instead
Clear, outcome-driven scopes.
Board-ready summaries that speak for themselves.
Quietly stacking relationships and renewals over time.
If you would like to speak to a reference client in a similar sector, DDG can usually arrange that later in the sales process once NDAs are in place.
How feedback is used
Every review ends with a check on clarity, priority, and recommendation.
DDG uses client feedback to improve the Cyber Posture Review structure, sharpen the Fix-First Plan, and decide whether ongoing assurance support would make sense.
Clarify the outcome
Did the engagement give stakeholders a clearer picture of risk?
Confirm the next step
Does the client know what to fix first, who owns it, and why it matters?
Improve the review
Feedback is used to sharpen the Review, Fix-First Plan, and ongoing assurance model.
The core questions are simple: Did we give you a clearer picture of risk? Do you know what to do first? Would you recommend DDG to a peer?
Your own experience
Want to see if DDG can give you the same clarity?
The Cyber Risk & Assurance Review is the fastest, lowest-risk way to see whether DDG can give you a clear joined-up picture of your risk and what to fix first.